The Ugly Truth About COVID

The Ugly Truth About COVID




Nick Hudson, an actuary and private equity investor, co-founded Pandemics~ Data& Analytics( PANDA) in response to the many threats to civil rights and freedoms that have occurred during the COVID-1 9 pandemic response. While media and public health universities have engaged in a campaign of smoke and mirrors — one that is perpetuating paralyzing horror, needlessly, to this day — data and facts don’t lie.

Hudson and his team at PANDA, which include a data commentator, economist, “doctors “, big-hearted data psychoanalyst and public health professionals, are using live data1 and open science to entitle the public to activity freedom of choice and prolong free civilizations. 2

Hudson spoke at the inaugural BizNews Investment Conference in March 2021, and his keynote address is above. He interprets the ugly truth about COVID-1 9, which is that the world is being crippled by fear due to a inaccurate narration. Anyone who challenges that narrative is being labeled as a lunatic, a danger or a danger to society, which is furthering the repression and unjustified fear.

Bringing COVID-1 9 Truth to Light

George Washington famously said, “Truth will ultimately prevail where there are plans taken to impart it to light.”3 With that in attention, Hudson experienced the “seeds of a great tragedy” being embed with the inaccurate COVID-1 9 narrative, and has started it a mission to get the truth out. So, what is the reality about the pandemic? Harmonizing to Hudson: 4

A virus that presents high risk to few and unimportant gamble to most hit some regions

Few are susceptible to severe disease

There are several accessible treatments

Asymptomatic beings are not major motorists of disease

Lockdowns and mask authorizations haven’t ran and instead effected immense harm

The prone were hurt instead of helped

The misinformation has been spewed from the beginning, including by World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. In a March 3, 2020, media briefing, he territory, “Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-1 9 contingencies have died. By comparison, seasonal influenza generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.”5

But according to Hudson, the 3.4% represents suit fatality rate( CFR ), which is the number of deaths from COVID-1 9 divided by the number of cases of COVID-1 9, while the 1% is infection fatality rate( IFR ), or the number of deaths divided by all infected individuals.

“By conflating these two separate points( CFR and IFR ), ” Hudson said, “Tedros was effectively lying.” Quantitative scientist John Ioannidis, prof of medication at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, calculated the IFR for COVID-1 9 in a review of 61 seroprevalence studies, which was a median of 0.23%, and 0.05% in beings younger than 70.6

Based on this, the IFR for COVID-1 9 is lower than that of the flu. And wouldn’t you know it, in a New England Journal of Medicine editorial published March 26, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID ), and colleagues expressed the view that “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-1 9 may ultimately has become still more akin to those of a serious seasonal influenza.”7

The media have stifled this point, Hudson observed, along with the fact that there’s a 1,000 goes gap in mortality among the persons younger than 19 and those older than 70 — something that should have been taken into account in the pandemic response.

Is COVID-1 9 Really a’ Novel Virus’?

Further inflaming widespread horror is the idea that COVID-1 9 is a “novel virus, ” which impels it sound like it’s something humans “ve never” encountered before. But is it certainly? Harmonizing to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“The reality is that the coronavirus is a very close relative , not even a separate subspecies, a very close relative of the 2003 SARS virus. There are seven referred coronaviruses known to cause disease in humans, probably many others, and four members of them is generally circulation.

Annual, global circulation. So the mention of this ailment is terribly inconsistent. Now a had increased by any figure, SARS. A discrepancy of SARS. It’s not novel.”

One study even pointed out that 81% of parties not exposed to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that cases COVID-1 9, were still able to mount an immune response against it, which “suggests at least some built-in immune protection from SARS-CoV-2 … ”8

Nonetheless, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technical leading for the COVID-1 9 pandemic, stated that “a majority of the world’s population is prone to illnes from this virus.”9 This is the firstly of two key component that, Hudson said, lead to “homosapienophobia” — the idea that everyone is dangerous until established healthy.

The idea of universal susceptibility to COVID-1 9 is nonsense, Hudson memo, as was demonstrated early on with the Diamond Princess cruise ship. Among the 3,711 fares and crew onboard the Diamond Princess, 712( 19.2%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and of these 46.5% were asymptomatic at the time of testing. Of those depicting indications, merely 9.7% required intensive care and 1.3%( nine) died. 10

PANDA data likewise showed that, starting in February 2021, there was not universal susceptibility to the virus. Their data pictured cumulative COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. In Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, the population fatality rate was 112 per million compared to 710 per million in Europe and the Americas.

As for Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, Hudson said, “the population fatality rate there virtually isn’t an epidemic. In a conventional year, they’d have 10,000 deaths per million from all causes.”

Dread Mongering Over Asymptomatic Spread

The second element that enables the doctrine of “everyone being a danger” to continue is the idea of asymptomatic spread driving canker. “I was absolutely aghast to find out the poor quality of the science” behind it, Hudson said.

One of the seminal papers involved one lady who were allegedly fouled 16 colleagues while she was asymptomatic. 11 The study was widely used to suggest that asymptomatic spread was coming, but arguing later ensued over whether the woman was actually asymptomatic when the others were infected or if she was symptomatic and is dealt with for flu-like evidences at the time. 12

In June 2020, Kerkhove also made it very clear that people who have COVID-1 9 without any manifestations “rarely” move the disease to others. But in a striking about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later. June 9, 2020, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s emergencies curriculum, promptly backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s statement, saying the statements were “misinterpreted or perhaps we didn’t use the most elegant names to explain that.”1 3

“It’s utter, emit stupidity, ” Hudson said, adding that Fauci likewise stated in January 2020, “asymptomatic transmission has never been the motorist of eruptions. The operator of eruptions is always a symptomatic person.”1 4

A JAMA Network Open study last-minute obtain, in December 2020, that asymptomatic transmission is not a primary driver of infection within households. 15 A study in Nature Communications also ascertained “there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive someone to retraced close contacts.”1 6

Lockdown Madness

The myth of widespread asymptomatic spread is what was used to justify worldwide lockdowns of healthy parties. “Bruce Aylward will go down in autobiography as criminal matters of gigantic prominence, ” Hudson said, referring to Aylward’s role as heads of state of a WHO team that called Wuhan, China, and concluded lockdowns were working to stop COVID-1 9 spread. 17




“He takes a delegation to China, spends a few days, then comes back and says everyone should follow China’s response, the doctrine of universal susceptibility, ” Hudson said. Yet, prior to the COVID-1 9 pandemic official the guiding principles for pandemic response programs recommend against large-scale quarantine of the healthy.

In fact, WHO wrote that during an flu pandemic, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry and exit screening and strip ending are “not recommended in any circumstance.”1 8P TAGEND

Likewise, in 2021 a study published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation encountered no significant benefits on COVID-1 9 occurrence proliferation in regions expending more restricted nonpharmaceutical involvements( NPIs) such as mandatory stay-at-home and business shutdown seeks( i.e ., lockdowns ). 19

Data compiled by PANDA likewise observed no relationship between lockdowns and COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. The ailment followed a trajectory of linear slump regardless of whether or not lockdowns were imposed.

What isn’t a lie, however, is that lockdowns campaign a great deal of distres. Child mortality, privation, starvation and joblessness is on the increase, as are stalls in medical treatment and diagnosis, mental disorder among boy, suicide and deaths of despair.

Education has been stopped for an estimated 1.6 billion children, Hudson said, and a questionnaire of 2,000 U.S. adults revealed that 1 in 6 Americans started regiman for the first time during 2020. Almost half( 45%) of the survey respondents reconfirmed that the COVID-1 9 pandemic was the driving reason that triggered them to seek a therapist’s help. 20 Harmonizing to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“Perhaps the hardest thing for me to swallow about all of this is in undergraduate epidemiology, it is a well-known finding that when you are confronted with a disease with sharp-worded perimeter graduation, as you are with coronavirus , appropriate measures to generally muffles the spread of the disease have the effects, reliably, of transfer the disease burden onto the vulnerable, who we should be protecting. They deteriorate coronavirus mortality.”

Mask Rhetoric Is Misleading

It’s been touted that face masks are essential to stopping the spread of COVID-1 9 and trying to save 130,000 lives in the U.S. alone. 21 But in 2019, the The world health organisation analyzed 10 randomized inhibited ordeals and concluded, “there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”2 2

Only one randomized inhibited tribulation has been conducted on mask usage and COVID-1 9 dissemination, and it located cover-ups did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. 23

You may remember that in the early days of the pandemic, face disguises were not recommended for the general public. In February 2020, Christine Francis, a consultant for infection avoidance and control at WHO installations, was featured in a video, holding up a expendable face mask.

She said, “Medical concealments like this one cannot protect against the brand-new coronavirus when exerted alone … WHO only recommends the purpose of applying masks in specific cases.”2 4 As of March 31, 2020, WHO was still advising against the use of face masks for parties without indications, stating that there is “no evidence” that such mask usage frustrates COVID-1 9 dissemination. 25

But by June 2020, the rhetoric had changed. Citing “evolving evidence, ” WHO overturned their recommendation and began advising governments to encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult. 26 Yet that very same day, June 5, 2020, WHO published an announcement stating: 27

“At present, there is no direct sign( from studies on COVID-1 9 and in healthy beings in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy parties in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-1 9. ”

The U.S. Middles for Disease Control and Prevention did a same about-face on mask utilization, citing a study of two hair dressers in Missouri, who were reportedly symptomatic with COVID-1 9 and styled 139 clients’ hair.

None of the clients tested positive for COVID-1 9, which the CDC proposed was because they and the stylists wore cover-ups. 28 Hudson belief, however, that the customers were probably young and not prone to the virus in the first place.

Another study published in the CDC’s journal Emerging Infectious Diseases territory, “We did not find evidence that surgical-type face concealments are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when wear by polluted persons( informant limit) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”2 9

PANDA data likewise indicated no differences in transmission in positions with mask mandatories and those without. Still, health officials are now advising you are able to double or triple up on cover-ups to reach them work better.

Vaccine Being Sold as a Ticket to Freedom

People who stand to utter countless billions out of COVID-1 9 vaccines are now selling them as a ticket to freedom, Hudson moods 😛 TAGEND

“How convenient that we now have a logic that tells us that we need to inoculate 7.8 billion people for a disease that has a want survival rates of 99.95% for parties under the age of 70. The profiteering here is naked. It is transparent.”

It’s a sad situation when adolescents, who aren’t at increased risk, are rowing up for inoculations only to get their sovereignties back, he computes. When you include in all the other inconsistencies and lies — PCR research that are not capable of diagnosing infectiousness, inflated fatality amounts, restrictions on travel, media information and arbitrary conventions, like the CDC’s recent change in physical distancing in classrooms from 6 feet to 3 feet3 0 — it’s as though we’re living in an Orwellian reality.

With looming vaccine passports, the loss of personal immunities is at an unprecedented level, while people are generally “enslaved by fear” — fear of infection or reinfection, “long COVID, ” resurgence and mutant discrepancies. “The underpinnings of our civilization are under threat, ” Hudson indicated, and we have a choice. “We’ve been propagandized up against a cliff, will we be propagandized off or will we push back? ”

He advocates people to support the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for “focused protection” and receiving a middle ground between fastening down an entire economy and exactly “letting it rip.” As of April 4, 2021, the written declaration has accumulated 41,890 signatures from medical practitioner and over 13,796 signatures from medical and public health scientists. 31

In addition, the declaration is open for public signatures and has obtained 764,089 from concerned citizens various regions of the world. The website allows you to read and sign the declaration, reacts numerous frequently asked questions, shares the science behind the proposals and was explained that the declaration was written.

PANDA also published a protocol for reopening civilization “to provide a road map out of the prejudicial round of lockdowns.”3 2 Hudson quoted Nelson Mandela, who stated courage is not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. We all need to strive for courage and foundation awareness campaigns aimed at stopping the injurious narrative, alleviating fear and the protection future freedom.

auto traffic exchange

Read more: articles.mercola.com









Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *