Women’s teams of 2020: Who’s committing to the UCI’s new guidelines, who’s not, and why

Women’s teams of 2020: Who’s committing to the UCI’s new guidelines, who’s not, and why

auto traffic exchange

In early October, in the final weeks of the cycling season, the UCI announces the teams that have registered lotions to compete at the different levels of the sport for the coming year. Earlier this week we encompassed the men’s WorldTour and ProTeam moves for 2020, and now it’s is necessary to take a closer look at the women’s peloton.

Structural alterations

The coming season investigates the first steps toward seismic reforms in women’s cycling, is planned to be phased in over the coming three seasons. The practical effect of this is a split of the women’s peloton from one disagreement- UCI Women’s Teams- into two- UCI WorldTeams and UCI Women’s Continental Teams.

A ranking system, based on qualities accrued by the top four equestrians on a team’s roster, was previously used to determine the 15 Women’s Teams who received automatic invitations to WorldTour hastens, with remaining lieu filled up by wildcards.

In total, there were 46 UCI Women’s Teams race in the 2019 season, some achieving much greater prominence than others, and with a wide variation in wages and benefits presented to the equestrians. A rider survey conducted in 2017 found that nearly half of the women’s UCI peloton then raced for less than 5,000 Euros( A $7,700) a year, with 17.5% of that group going fully unpaid.

For the 2020 season onward, however, the UCI is introducing upper-division UCI WorldTeams, who will gain automated access to WorldTour scoots. For the first time in women’s cycling, a minimum wage will be introduced at the WorldTeam level, and exploiting crews will too be assessed “on the basis of sporting, ethical, financial and administrative criteria, ” according to the UCI.

The WorldTeam tier gives a substantial step forward for women’s cycling, which has been criticised in the past for the absence of fiscal and career certificate it offered to female cyclists. Minimum incomes- well-established in the men’s peloton- was also being phased in, with wages of EUR1 5,000 in 2020, EUR2 0,000 in 2021, EUR2 7,500 in 2022, and from 2023, parity with men’s ProTeam( ex-Pro Continental)- currently around EUR3 0,000.

Also appearing for the first time are rules around celebration fee, sickness window-dressing, maternity consider, and limits named for race days.

best free website traffic generator

Separate to the introduction of the WorldTeam tier, the UCI has announced a reworked scoot docket, with four racing fractions: UCI Women’s WorldTour, UCI ProSeries, Class 1 and Class 2.


The UCI has also committed to a 10% per season increase to prize money for the top 20 riders in every scoot on the UCI calendar. For a full summing-up of the changes to the structure of women’s professional cycling, examine here.

Who’s stepping up as WorldTeams?

The UCI had originally planned for five squads to draw the change to WorldTeam status for 2020, but they’ve transcended that minimum grade, with eight units having submitted works. These should read as follows 😛 TAGEND

Ale BTC Ljubljana Canyon-SRAM Racing CCC-LIV FDJ Nouvelle- Aquitane Futuroscope Mitchelton-Scott Movistar Team Women Team Sunweb Trek-Segafredo

Some, like Trek-Segafredo, who the hell is trailblazers in their advocacy for women’s cycling and ratified a then-pregnant Lizzie Deignan to the team when they launched, are unsurprising inclusions. The other consistent topic is that most of the teams have an equivalent men’s squad in the WorldTour: simply Canyon-SRAM and Ale BTC Ljubljana are standalone women’s-only entities.

All of the eight prospective WorldTeams are in the top 15 on the Women’s WorldTour higher-rankings, so in that sense, it’s a fairly good representation of the upper echelons of the sport. However, there are some surprising omissions.

Who’s missing?

Boels-Dolmans, the top-ranked women’s team since 2016, and dwelling to four consecutive superhighway world endorses, is notably absent. Team manager Danny Stam is on record saying that he felt the reforms were happening “too fast”, although he was broadly supportive of moves to professionalise women’s cycling.

In an interview with Cyclingnews, Stam stated that the team had no problem meeting the minimum wage requirement, but located the additional costs associated with WorldTeam status very onerous for squads that did not have a corresponding men’s team to increase efficiencies.

free traffic exchange

Anna van der Breggen manufactured it look easy at the 2018 Tour of Flanders, riding away from the rest of the field to earn by over a minute.

For Boels-Dolmans there’s the lent complication that their sponsorship deals with plant hire company Boels and landscaping fellowship Dolmans expire at the end of 2020.

Other remarkable absences from the index of WorldTeam entrants include 😛 TAGEND

ParkHotel Valkenburg, the team of dominant sprinter Lorena Wiebes Virtu Cycling, the team of onetime world supporter and Tour of Flanders winner Marta Bastianelli WNT-Rotor, the team of Dutch powerhouse Kristen Wild and German climber Clara Koppenburg; and Bigla Pro Cycling, the team of the charismatic Dane, Cecilie Uttrup-Ludwig.

There’s concern from some unit proprietors that not enough is being done by the UCI to increase exposure for women’s cycling, dampening the value hypothesi for potential sponsors. There are also higher costs associated for WorldTeams, both from the perspective of registration rewards and in staffing. Given the lack of money in the boast relative to men’s cycling, the parts apparently don’t add up to create a strong business case for making a jump to WorldTeam level for a majority of the existing women’s teams.

What it all means

Women’s professional cycling is in a period of flux coming into the 2020 season, and the longer-term implications of the well-intentioned- and long overdue- reforms are as yet unknown. A general increase in minimum team sizes at both divides has opened up a few cavities, but it sees there’s been a much more significant contraction in the number of units applying for licenses for 2020.

To date, the UCI has only listed the eight WorldTeam entrants- the final tally of crews at the Continental level are as yet unconfirmed. By ProCyclingStats’ count, however, there were 27 women’s crews( eight WorldTeam, 19 Continental) in the mixture for 2020 between the two separations- a significant drop from the 46 UCI Women’s Teams of 2019.

There have been murmurs of moves into women’s cycling by EF Education First, Ineos and Katusha, although these are as yet unsubstantiated. Nonetheless, given the majority of the proposed Women’s WorldTeams sit alongside top-tier men’s units, it seems that this is a template “whos working”. Although there is no formal requirement for men’s WorldTour squads to field a correspond women’s crew, hopefully it becomes an increasingly common display over the coming years.

By 2022, the UCI plans to have 15 WorldTeams competing at the top division of women’s sport, and are more than half of the acces there before the 2020 season has even begun. It really remains to be determined whether the rising tide will parent all boats, or purely be a drop in the seas and oceans in terms of achieving equality for women’s cycling.

The post Women’s teams of 2020: Who’s committing to the UCI’s new guidelines, who’s not, and why appeared first on CyclingTips.

Free Traffic Generator free traffic to my website

Read more: feedproxy.google.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *